The original subject I wanted to use for this email was “fuck humble” but that’s a bit but to drop in your inbox, even for me.

But, fuck humble has been one of my mottos for a while now.

Reason being, if you’re good at something, I don’t see any point in being humble about it.

Now that doesn’t mean you don’t have anything to learn or that you should be cocky when you are genuinely in the presence of someone more capable or knowledgeable than you. And it certainly doesn’t mean you should always be trying to prove how smart or whatever you are.

But it does mean that if it’s appropriate to take ownership of what skills or abilities you’ve developed then you should own the hell out of it and be proud.

This all started when my wife, Jen, gave me a compliment on something I do well. I don’t remember what it was, it could have been a bunch of things, I do a lot well. Let’s say it was building something. And I simply responded: “Yep. Thanks.” She laughed and said, “You’re not much for humility are you?” Fuck humble.

No false humility, no denying the compliment. Just owning it.

Sometimes it means conveying your expertise so that it can benefit someone else.

Like how I could tell you that a long time client, friend, and fellow gym owner recently said of my kettlebell ballistics program that it was “the most value for my dollar I have ever spent in my career.” This was unprompted. This is a man who has spent tens of thousands on education.

Humility is great if it helps you learn and be open minded.

Not so useful if it’s actually a way of keeping you protected and closed off.

Have a great weekend.

To your pride,

Everyone thinks they’re advanced.

Oh it’s not that egregious, like if you were to ask someone directly how they rate their skill at whatever they wouldn’t say “I’m somewhere between advanced and expert.”

Instead it’s exposed in subtle ways in the decisions they make. They don’t go to workshops or classes and they don’t hire coaches. They self-select into groups where their skill is at the topic of the curve, even if overall the group isn’t all that advanced. Or they add complexity to their approach when they should be simplifying by taking away. The list goes on.

You know who never outgrows the basics?

True experts.

The best.

You never, ever, ever outgrow the basics. Good fundamentals are the key to advanced progression in everything I’ve ever done.

Recently I wrote up this simple strength workout basically as an example for how to structure your strength training if you’re a beginner, and how to progress it over time. It’s part of this guide I put together with five essential life skills. I’d love for you to download it and check it out.

The program is so simple, and is really just the fundamentals you need for strength with nothing more. Just to test it out I started doing it after my powerlifting meet in May. And then I kept doing it. And kept doing it, and I’m still doing it.

Because I love it. It’s so simple, but so effective. It’s just the basics, but that’s all you need.

Anyway, I was walking home from the gym today after doing it and I thought, you know, most people overcomplicate their training way too much. You’d be amazed at what you can do just by focusing on the fundamentals. Even the complicated injury or movement problem you have that you think requires a complex solution probably isn’t as complex as you think and you might be surprised how quickly you can resolve it by focusing on a fundamental and just tweaking it a little with biofeedback.

Jen and I had some friends over for dinner recently and a cooking topic of conversation came up. The question was, should you pepper steaks after grilling instead of before because pepper burns easily and thus you’ll burn it on the grill. I’ve always peppered (and salted) steaks before grilling, but I could see the point that it might in fact burn or become toasted – especially if you’re searing.

So I decided to do a simple experiment. I’d grill a couple steaks with pepper before grilling, and a couple I’d add fresh pepper after grilling. Then we’d have a blind taste test. The hypothesis was that fresh pepper after grilling would taste better.

This is fundamentally how science works. You have a question, you come up with a hypothesis, and you develop a method to test your hypothesis.

And though a very simple experiment, it gets pretty close to the gold standard of science experiments in which you directly test the hypothesis with blinded participants.

As usual, that’s where the problems started.

Last night when I went to grill the steaks for dinner I realized I was almost out of charcoal and it was too late to go to the store. No big deal, I had just enough to make it work.

But the result was that I didn’t have as much heat as I normally would, and the heat was more concentrated in one spot on the grill than I would have liked.

As a result, I wasn’t able to grill all 4 steaks perfectly the same like I normally would.

Which means that if there was a detectable difference in taste, it could be down to the difference in grilling rather than the difference in peppering.

If you’re at this point wondering who cares so much about grilling and pepper you haven’t zoomed out to look at the bigger picture.

SCIENCE IS HARD.

This experiment should have been very simple to execute perfectly, and it should have been easy to adhere to the methodology and experiment design. And due to unforeseen circumstances it turned out to be impossible.

Imagine how hard it is to examine nutritional differences across populations and decades.

Imagine what happens in a complex drug trial.

Imagine how hard it is to isolate any one factor in a moving, changing system.

Thinking critically about this, to say nothing of noting the mountains of evidence that have been dumped in the trash after we realized we were wrong about something that we were previously so sure of, should lead you to the conclusion that the results of most scientific studies are total bullshit.

It’s only after time and many, many, many iterations of same and similar experiments that we can even begin to have confidence that we have a handle on how something works and what factors correlate with what outcomes.

To use one of the biggest nutrition arguments as an example, the notion that we can say “carbs are bad” or “fats are bad” based on some garbage pop science is preposterous.

This is not to say science is worthless. It’s not. But science is not canon. It’s the best method we’ve found thus far to investigate the world around us and approach problem-solving. But it’s limited, extremely limited.

In fact by the very nature of the approach it’s almost entirely useless on an individual level. At best what you get from a large study might be a good starting point for self-experimentation. At worst it’s incredibly and dangerously misleading.

So next time you see the results of the latest pop science study being pushed into the media firehose by authors hoping to lasso more funding for their programs remember that regardless of whether the conclusions coincidence with or refute your existing beliefs it’s probably worthless and you should give it no more weight than the latest celebrity opinion.