ddn

David Dellanave

  • Blog
  • Programs
  • Coaching
  • Seminars
  • Contact

by david 7 Comments

Wild Game Hunting: Inhumane or The Most Humane?

Wild Game Hunting: Inhumane or The Most Humane?

This is a guest post by a very good friend and long time online coaching client Aron Woolman. For the past five years I’ve spent a weekend in late January in southern Texas hunting hogs and raising money for the kin of fallen special operations forces thanks to Aron’s involvement in the Silent Warrior Foundation. In the wake of one hunt, Aron shared a photo of his freezer filled with meat from this year’s hunting season (including hunting back home in North Carolina). The following was in response to someone criticizing Aron and questioning the morality of his mode of procuring sustenance. His response was so cogent, and so important to understand that I asked if I could post it as a guest post.

 I’d like to address your comment about my refrigerator. I am not a trophy hunter, and most hunters do not fall into the category of hunting mainly or completely because of a desire to kill animals. I view hunting as a way to connect on a very intimate and personal level with nature, our own animal instincts, and with my food.

I accept that some people adopt a vegan lifestyle for both ideological and scientific reasons, and I will not argue the scientific merits of that diet here. I also will not try to convince a vegan that his position is ideologically incorrect, and don’t expect a vegan to (successfully) argue that my life as a hunter is ideologically incorrect.

Most Americans are neither vegan, nor hunters. And I can confidently say that my lifestyle as a hunter is ideologically and morally superior to most non-hunting meat eating and vegetarian or pescetarian Americans. I know that is a bold statement, so let me explain.

The meat you eat doesn't come from a scene that looks like this - unless you hunted it.
The meat you eat doesn’t come from a scene that looks like this – unless you hunted it.

Most agricultural animals in this country are raised in CAFO (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation) environments, where they are forced to live their lives in close quarters, standing and covered in their own feces, and eating unnatural diets. Pigs and chickens are often kept in large, long buildings with no sunlight, and are bred under conditions that we would think of as being derived from SAW-style torture films. These situations are unnatural, and immensely cruel. Even organic operations, which often market their products with cartoonish pictures or silhouettes of farms, are not living on the farms that we see in the pictures. Cage free chickens can never see the sunlight and be kept in a chicken feces filled warehouse and remain cage free. “Pastured” animals often live in the same environment, but in a building with a door and a small fenced outdoor area. If the animals can find the door, maybe they can spend sometime outdoors. Still, the majority of their lives will be spent indoors, and this is for the animals being raised for premium products.

For those who forsake animal flesh, their store bought butter, milk, and eggs still come from these sources, as well as the foods that are made from these ingredients. For those who do eat meat, every time you buy food with meat in it from a fast food place, or even a high end restaurant that gets it’s food from a large distributor, you are voting with your wallet to support this industry of cruelty. Think about that. Every time most Americans eat, or buy animal protein at the grocery store, they are making a choice to support animal cruelty. The only way around this is to buy from farmers or a farmer cooperative/aggregator, raise animals yourself, or hunt.

Although I am guilty of eating out at restaurants and occasionally buying ingredients that are sourced from CAFO’s, buying from farmers and hunting severely decreases our support of that system. We are lucky here in the Triangle of North Carolina to have great access to farmer’s markets. My wife and I have made a commitment to each other and to our children not to bring meat into the house that doesn’t come from animals we have hunted or from farms we have visited. These animals are raised in the environments that fill the pictures of meat and produce sections of the supermarkets, environments that are where these animals are meant to be. They live happy, unrestricted lives.

1939762_10202613370508147_1088335735_n

When I shoot a deer (or pig, elk, bison, bear, turkey or game bird), that deer has lived its life in a natural environment up to that point in time. It has experienced less stress than any CAFO animal, and will almost certainly die a quick death. (Part of responsible hunting is only taking shots that you are confident will not maim an animal – there’s no maybe or hey lets wing it.) That meat gets processed by a butcher, and fills my freezer. This year was a particularly successful year in terms of harvested game, and as a result my family will be able to eat from that animal protein for much of the year. My children will not have to worry about antibiotics in their meat, and our food will not be recalled because of e-coli outbreaks at one of the 4 food large food processors in the United States. The fat and chemical composition of the game and farm raised meat we eat is highly superior to even the best USDA Prime cut of meat, because it was fed what that animal naturally eats, not a source of abundant grain caused by illogical farm subsidies.

From time to time, people tell me that hunting is cruel. I argue that eating conventional food is much more cruel. Just because you don’t witness the suffering does not mean that it does not happen. The system is set up to remove you from those thoughts, to remove you another step further from your food.

Filed Under: Blog, Ideas, Uncategorized

by david Leave a Comment

Autonomy Repair

Autonomy Repair

The other day I listened to a really beautiful episode of Krista Tippet’s On Being with Greg Boyle​, a Jesuit priest who founded an organization called Homeboy Industries in L.A. The remarkable​ work that Homeboy does is one of those things I heard about years and years ago and then forgot about. Basically, Homeboy employs former gang members in a variety of businesses from bakery to screenprinting, and in doing so has created a viable path out of gangs for youth in L.A.

Anyway, at one point Greg very briefly explains the concept of “attachment repair.” I am not a psychologist nor do I play one on the Internet, but the basic premise is that if you grew up in a desolately poor neighborhood with a mom who was doing her best just to survive there’s a good chance you were never soothed nor did you learn to soothe yourself in a healthy and functional manner when you were developing. So while most of these kids have a type of resilience you and I will never have in spades, they also lack a different type of resilience to deal with the stresses and strife of life. Gangs very much fill those needs, so when you take away the gang you’re missing a huge piece of necessary function. A big part of what Homeboy Industries does is provides the environment where that attachment repair can take place.

It got me thinking about the pattern I’ve seen repeat with my gym members and training clients. Essentially, they begin to regain autonomy in a way that they haven’t expressed for ages, if ever.

It starts out as a simple thing. They come to the gym looking for someone to tell them what to do. But instead of doing exactly that, we give them choices and the tools to determine their own outcomes and make their own decisions. And it’s powerful, and there are second-order effects.

I’ve talked before about how people who join the gym tend to quit their jobs or end a major relationship within a few months of joining.

And it all comes back to regaining autonomy.

It seems harmless to outsource your grocery shopping to Blue Apron and your driving to Uber and your entertainment to Netflix, but there is a cost and it’s a high one at that. But it’s much bigger than the new tech darlings. It’s giving up the autonomy of your health by thinking that the doctor can always fix everything with a magic pill, which they can’t. It’s giving up the autonomy to eat food that nourishes you and doesn’t destroy the environment by opting for convenience and productized food. It’s relying on vast amounts of unsustainable energy to drive everywhere and walk nowhere.

Fitness is ground zero of regaining your personal autonomy. You start with the small choices of deciding what type of deadlift to do. It seems inconsequential, but it’s not. It’s your decision, your determination.

Then you start adding skills, becoming more capable and with every new capability there’s a new level of autonomy.

Pretty soon you don’t have to rely on anyone for anything, you get to choose to cooperate because you can not because you have to.

Autonomy repair is one of the first steps to repairing this broken society.

Filed Under: Blog

by david Leave a Comment

Why I Will Never Use TripAdvisor

Why I Will Never Use TripAdvisor

I could summarize this article by saying TripAdvisor sucks and leave it at that, but I’m going to try to illustrate a broader concept with it instead.

I’ve traveled pretty extensively in various parts of the world and one thing I never do is rely on TripAdvisor to find places to eat or things to do. In case you’re not familiar, TripAdvisor has become almost the de facto standard app/website/whatever for travelers to leave reviews and find places. It’s like the Yelp of travel, and businesses have a serious love-hate relationship with it.

On the one hand lots of positive TripAdvisor reviews can cause business to boom. It’s a self-propagating cycle where the more good reviews they get the more people come and so on. But on the other hand, not having strong reviews or not having a presence at all can mean you’re relegated to struggling for business and may not stay in business long at all.

At face value this sounds fine. Good businesses get good reviews and the cream rises to the top. And in a perfectly rational world that’s what would happen and everything would be great. But that’s not what happens.

To understand what goes wrong we have to back out and look at a broader concept. In Seeing Like a State James C. Scott puts forth the argument that whenever you reduce a complex system to just a few parts, and make those parts prominently visible, or legible, you effectively eliminate the non-legible parts.

This is illustrated in his book by taking a historical look at early Prussian scientific forestry practices. The first to take a scientific or industrialized approach to forestry, the Prussians simplified forest management down to what they deduced were the vitally important parts. They switched to a monoculture of the Norway Spruce, prized for its efficiency in utility value as a commodity, planted in perfect rows, culled out underbrush and pests that didn’t contribute meaningfully to productive output, and mapped and surveyed only and exactly what was important to the forester: where the trees were and little to nothing else.

The results, like the effectiveness of letting the “wisdom of the crowds” sort winners from losers in business, were exceedingly positive in the short run. The first generation of scientifically managed forests were incredibly productive and profitable. A win for science and a boon for the economy.

Trouble was, the next generation was a disaster. Subsequent generations were so bad that the Germans had to invent a new term for the death of forests: Waldsterben.

Turns out all of those annoying factors that were simplified out of the equation actually mattered, and not in a small way. Removing underbrush, pests, grazing animals, and switching to a monocrop were just a few of the optimizations that massively disrupted the soil ecology rendering it barely able to support a forest.

Which brings us back to the legibility that TripAdvisor reviews create of businesses. Far from capturing the “wisdom of the crowd” the reality is that what is made legible what satisfies the lowest common denominator.

I won’t take restaurant or food recommendations from nine-tenths of my friends. Sorry, but most just don’t have the depth or breadth of experience with great food to be able to tell the difference between acceptable and extraordinary, and I’m only interested in eating at extraordinary restaurants (in food or experience, not in cost – there’s a difference). So to know the average of what nine-tenths of my friends think tells me nothing I want to know. What I really want to know is what that one person I really trust thinks, but the average won’t tell me that.

What is made legible instead is a mix of what the predominant audience thinks is important. In Italy for example, Germany makes up the biggest group of tourists followed by Americans. Americans are notorious for complaining about having to pay to use a restroom (which is actually less common in Italy than it was a couple decades ago, but that’s neither here nor there). So there’s a high likelihood that one of the factors that is going to influence a review of a place is whether or not the bathroom is free. This kind of information might be useful to the ignorant looking for a free bathroom, but it’s useless to me looking for the best experiences and happy to pay a few cents to use a bathroom that will inevitably be many times cleaner than a free one.

Once this kind of information is the only thing that matters to the gatekeepers like TripAdvisor, they become the only thing that a business focuses on. People give high reviews for menus in English, so the restaurateur has to spend their energy creating menu translations that could have gone into creative dishes or spending more time picking what was fresh at the market. Hyper-local traditional menu items give way to more familiar favorites. And so on.

Instead of the cream rising to the top, the map becomes the territory and the territory becomes homogenized.

Instead, just as in all the other domains where selective legibility from high above a complex system is woefully ineffective, I rely on local knowledge.

I’ll find a local resident, preferably one not directly in the hospitality industry who may have vested interests in steering people a certain way (such as the hotel desk or concierge) and ask them where they would go, or take their family to eat for a good meal. Not where they think tourists should go, but where they’d go.

And while it’s not a perfect system, the results are far better than I could ever get from relying on average ratings from the masses. Asking someone local surfaces all kinds of complex knowledge that would be impossible to capture in an app rating system. Maybe the best restaurant around has better food but the owner is a total dick and a cancer in the community – I don’t want to support that, and a local is probably going to take that into account without even thinking twice about it.

In short, TripAdvisor sucks. But reducing complex systems to over-simplified parts to make them legible not only sucks, but it destroys the very systems they make legible.

It’s your turn to think about this. In what ways have you seen something complex and nuanced reduced to an oversimplification, and what harm has that caused?

Filed Under: Blog

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • …
  • 82
  • Next Page »

Olive Oil

Upcoming Workshops

    No events to show

Search

David Dellanave

David Dellanave, known most often as ddn, is a lifter, coach, and owner of The Movement Minneapolis in the Twin Cities. He implements biofeedback in training; teaching his clients to truly understand what their bodies are telling them. He’s coached a number of athletes who compete at the international level in sports ranging from grip to rugby, and his general population clients readily demonstrate how easy it can be to make progress.

Latest Tweets

  • Just now
  • Follow me on Twitter

Important Pages

  • Coaching
  • Seminars
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

Comments

  • david on 3 Tips for Lifting While Sorting Through SI Joint Pain
  • David Brochin on 3 Tips for Lifting While Sorting Through SI Joint Pain
  • Ken on How to Pass the RKC Snatch Test
  • Bethuel Njoroge on Wild Game Hunting: Inhumane or The Most Humane?
  • Jennifer Matthews on 3 Tips for Lifting While Sorting Through SI Joint Pain

Copyright © 2026 · Generate Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in