What Corrective Exercise Can’t Tell You

The truth is there is no such thing as corrective exercise. There are exercises, and they cause one or more of three effects:

  1. Desirable and desired adaptations and outcomes.
  2. Undesirable or undesired adaptations and outcomes.
  3. Immediately painful or harmful injuries or outcomes.

To be more accurate, any exercise is going to have outcomes that exist on a spectrum with some desirable and undesirable adaptations happening at the same time, with hopefully no immediate injury. The degree to which it’s skewed towards desirable depends on the programming – and how appropriate it is for the goal.

An example of this would be the classic bench press. While it will certainly build greater strength and rigidity in the chest and horizontal pressing musculature, at some point those ranges will be so strengthened that other various ranges of motion will be so disused as to be compromised – usually an undesirable outcome at least when it gets to a certain point.

If your shoulder mobility gets so compromised (or it started out that way) that you can no longer perform some other thing you need to be able to do (press overhead, reach in the back seat of a car, take off your bra) then you’d do some “corrective” exercises to bring about this new desired outcome.

So you see, there is no such thing as corrective exercise. There are exercises, and they either do what we want them to do or they don’t.

That being said, for the sake of argument, I’ll use the colloquial word corrective exercise to describe an exercise you do to elicit a very narrow and specific adaptation, usually to improve a specific movement function.

Let’s say you want to increase your ability to dorsiflex your ankle. A lack of dorsiflexion can hinder a squat, by forcing the shin to have to stay too vertical, pushing the hips back and shifting the center of gravity behind your base of support. Not strong.Ankle-Dorsiflexion

A simple and common ankle dorsiflexion drill is to simply (either from standing, or kneeling) push the knee over the toes, sometimes with band pressure around the ankle either pulling anteriorally or posteriorally.

This is a perfectly fine drill – with a caveat:

Is it good for your body to do?

We already know that you have limited ankle dorsiflexion and it’s negatively affecting your squat. Improving it would be helpful to the squat. But there’s a reason it’s not moving or at least there was, at some point. Is moving it going to make you better or worse?

You can certainly jam the square peg into the round hole, but you may be doing more harm than good.

Fortunately there is a very simple, very easy, and incredibly effective way to determine if this is good for you to do or not.

Enter biofeedback testing.

Biofeedback testing can be used for any movement, big or small. While the most common application for most people is going to be testing their macro movements (bench press, incline press, close grip bench press) I always encourage people to test EVERYTHING.

The video walks you through the exact example above, testing an ankle dorsiflexion drill to determine if it’s good for you to do or not. What’s more, I go through testing a common modification of the drill that is often used but I have found does not test well for most people with limited mobility. From experience I’ve learned that doing drills that don’t test well actually does more harm than good.

Are you still blindly doing things that you think are good for you, or are you testing it so you’re certain?

Why Different is Different

One of the more catchy things I’ve said, that has been quoted and attributed to me is this phrase, “Different shit is different.” Had I known how often I would be cited on that, I probably would have chosen something a little more elegant to be my legacy, but so it goes.

But, I want to formally clear up what the true intention behind this statement is, because it’s not exactly what some people have taken from it. What a lot of people take from this quip is that “Well, back squats and front squats are different but they’re both good so you should do them.” Sure, yes, but that’s not what I meant.

To understand where I’m coming from with this statement, you have to understand a certain mentality that some coaches have. It is often expressed in statements like “If you can’t squat below parallel with your body weight, you shouldn’t ever barbell back squat.”

Well, see, here’s the problem with that:

Different shit is different.

Truly, we have only began to understand the complexity of the human body. Not only does changing a single joint angle change ALL of the joint angles in the body as well as all associated muscular and connective tissue levers, but there is a nervous system change as well. These certainly well-intentioned coaches subscribe to a flawed philosophy of movement, that there is right and wrong, and moving “wrong” is a sure path to pain and injury.

Movements of the body don’t fall on a nice tidy spectrum where one leads to another which leads to another. It’s not a chain that relies on each link before it, where if one link is missing nothing can be done beyond that point.

Every movement is simultaneously discrete and connected.

Every movement either potentiates or inhibits another movement, but at the same time has it’s own independent effect on the body.

It’s for this reason that any assessment system that is predicated on the idea that the ability to do or not do one movement is predictive of another is inherently flawed.

It may well be that if you can’t do a bodyweight squat, you also can’t do a back squat. It also may not be true.

It definitely isn’t true that if you can’t do a bodyweight squat you’re guaranteed to get hurt doing a barbell back squat.

Because, different shit is different.

I take it with a grain of salt when someone says to me: “I can’t deadlift.” I refuse to believe that there isn’t some way, shape, or form in which you can pick up a weight from off the ground. There are truly very few people who actually can’t pick something up off the ground. If you bend over and pick up a pencil, you are doing a deadlift. It may not be a lot of weight, and it may not follow the conventional form of a deadlift, but make no mistake that you are lifting up a dead weight. That’s where we’ll start, and where we go from there only your body knows.

Sometimes the smallest tweak to one thing such as hand or foot position  is all that is needed to significantly change a movement, from something you can’t do without pain to something you can do completely pain free.

In fact, there is evidence that chronic low back pain is associated to reduced variability in movement. Of course, it’s hard to know which came first, the chicken or the egg, but I would offer that in my experience, the more variability in function you introduce to a person who is in pain, the more quickly they find themselves out of pain.

While I’d like to pretend to be all Eric Cressey up in this b and tell you exactly which nerves are innervating which muscles and explain exactly why one change causes a specific result the reality is that I don’t know, and neither does anyone else. In the end, my less-than-couth quip is about as good an explanation as any, and it doesn’t matter why because it doesn’t change the outcome.

Being able to move pain free in more ways begets moving pain free in more ways.

Once I had a client who couldn’t do a pain-free squat with any implement I handed her. Barbell, dumbbell, kettlebell, it didn’t matter – pain. Until I swapped the kettlebells in a front rack for a sandbag. Pain free squat. Was it the slightly different shape of the sandbag? Maybe. Or was it the fact that the sandbag was the only non-conductive implement she tried and this had an effect on the electrical impulses in her body? I don’t have a clue, but I know she could squat pain free.

Because, again and again we see, different shit is different.

So the next time that someone, or your own ideology, places an artificial limitation on you based on the idea that everything is the same stop and ask more questions. With better questions comes more progress and better results.

Fix Your Squeaky SI Joint

This is a guest article by Doctor of Physical Therapy, Erika Mundinger, who gave a tremendous talk at The Fitness Summit in 2015 on how to deal with back pain caused by SI joint dysfunction. Her talk was one of the most popular of the weekend, and I knew this information would be helpful to other lifters and coaches so I asked her to put together an article for me. While there can be myriad causes of back pain, among experienced lifters it very often comes down to a lack of complete function in the SI complex, which these alternatives do a remarkably effective job at resolving. Hit us with the science, Erika…

It’s not news that 70-80% of the population has or will at some point experience dysfunction related to back pain. But back pain can come in many forms which can make dealing with it a bit tricky.  Somewhere between 15-30% of the people with back pain of these people will have either an accompanying sacroiliac joint (SI) dysfunction or an isolated SI dysfunction. This can range from a minor ache to a completely disabling. When it comes to lifting weights, having SI pain can be downright scary. I hear weekly in the clinic “I can’t work out until this goes away.” Unfortunately, what we need to help our clients understand is that not exercising will certainly not help in resolving back pain. It doesn’t “just go away and fix itself” as some may want to believe, or as they may have been misinformed from an outside source. Most often there is a faulty movement pattern that occurs through the pelvis that will keep the problem at a low level smolder that may be almost undetectable only to have to it come back again a week, a month, a year later. On the other hand, exercising incorrectly will often aggravate back pain, putting people in a bit of a catch-22.

So we have no movement aggravating symptoms, yet moving may aggravate symptoms.

So what do we do? Ignore it? Hope it goes away anyway? Push through it? No pain no gain?

Where’s the middle ground? There has to be a way for not just physical therapists, but also for trainers and coaches, to help clients exercise both around pain and to CORRECT the associated causes of the pain in the gym aside.

While the typical home exercise program that involves just piriformis stretching, foam rolling, and clamshells is effective, there are more effective paths a lifter can take. (Note: These are beneficial exercises for SIJ dysfunction. Stay tuned for part II with more on at-home self  maintenance exercises.)

First, it helps to understand how the SI joint moves mechanically.Sacroiliac_Joint

The SI joint and pelvis, like any other part of our body, moves on a three-dimensional axis. We can isolate each axis individually but for daily, functional movement, it moves simultaneously forward/back, side-to-side, and up/down. Think of walking for example. As one foot is forward the other foot is behind, the trunk rotates, the pelvis rotates, and one side will lift while the other side drops. Our muscles form “slings” around the pelvis working on longitudinal, horizontal, and oblique axes creating stability, also called force closure, from all directions.

Ok, so that sounds fancy and can get infinitely more complex if we were to break it down further. But what does this mean? In simple terms, to restore optimal mechanics in three dimensions it can help to train multi-planar movements.

How do I know it’s my SI, and not something else?

First, see your doctor. Typical SI symptoms will involve pain offset from the lower back, just above the hip and buttock. Pain will refer to the buttock, top of hamstring, and possibly around to the side of the hip. Symptoms will typically worsen with prolonged sitting, bending forward, bending forward and lifting heavy loads, and standing. Most people will feel better with walking and a bit of rotation. If this sounds like you, give these movements a try and see if you notice reduction in pain and better mobility. But again, these are “typical” symptoms and there is still variance from person to person. If symptoms are more localized to the spine itself, include pain shooting down the leg past the knee, or if you have numbness and tingling in to a specific area of your lower leg and foot, these may not be appropriate or productive exercises to try. And of course, if things aren’t improving, seek medical advice.

Without further ado, here are a few common exercises with correctional and rotational modifications to try with your current lifts.

Single Leg Deadlifts

Why it hurts:

This is a fantastic exercise to train the glutes, core, and hamstrings not to mention pelvic stability and balance. However, if we have a weak glute max and glute med, which is typically seen with SI dysfunction, the we get uneven closure of the SI joint from an unbalanced force locking system. We get excessive longitudinal pull through the SI without enough diagonal/oblique stability. The result is even more compression and shearing on an already painful joint.

The Fix: Single Leg Rotational Deadlifts

This exercise utilizes more glute med and piriformis than the single leg deadlift to help provide more uniform force closure. To perform this exercise, start with a kettlebell or dumbbell at the side of the foot, bend down rotating slightly to pick up the bell, and then stand up to a neutral position.

10 single leg rotational deadlift start

Please note, if you lack hip or spine mobility to comfortably twist to pick up the bell, or if balance is poor, elevate the kettlebell or dumbbell by placing a yoga block or a small step under the bell at the side of your foot so you don’t have to bend as far.  The exercise will still be beneficial and will prevent any straining.

This exercise can also be done on two feet if balance is poor.

Lunge

Why it hurts: As with the single leg deadlift above, this is a single plane movement that relies on glute max, glute med, and hamstrings. While EMG studies have shown that there is more glute med and max activation with the single leg squat compared to the lunge, looking at activation alone can be misleading. In a single leg squat there is higher activation of glute med than the lunge, but there is a much greater activation difference between working and non-working leg. The result is a force differential that is significantly greater across a system that is already lacking the function to stabilize opposing forces. In other words, the single leg squat is too stressful and looking at activation of one muscle in isolation can be misleading as to how it contributes to the system. The net result is that the lunge is a better exercise, but we need to make it activate more glute med than in a normal lunge pattern – that only exacerbates the singular plane problem.

The Fix: Curtsy lunge

Similar to single leg rotational deadlift above, this exercise helps to activate more glute med and piriformis for SI mobility, not to mention the rotational movement of the exercise helps to retrain normal SI mechanics and rotation. Start with your foot on a Valslide, or furniture slider, or if on a hard floor have a towel under your sliding foot. As you slide your foot back, cross it behind you. As you stand back up think about engaging all the muscles around your hip to pull yourself back in to standing.

curtsy lunge

Kettlebell Swings

Swings are great for glutes, not to mention great for simultaneously getting a quick burst of cardio. But SI dysfunction sufferers tend to approach this move with a bit of trepidation and fear. This is one exercise I have heard clients at the gym commonly say “I wish I could do swings, but I always hurt too much after.”

The Fix: One-Handed Lateral Kettlebell Swings

This motion utilizes the spine’s natural rotation and fires a ton of muscles along the diagonal planes, engaging the glute max and med, obliques, and lats to name a few. Stand with your feet slightly wider than hip distance and staggered with one foot forward and one foot behind. Grab the kettlebell in the opposite hand of the forward leg (so if stance is staggered with right foot forward use your left hand to swing the bell). Perform a one-handed swing keeping the torso pointed forward but allow the hips to rotate slightly following the bell at a 45 degree angle from midline.

KB swing startKB swing end

Fix Yo Biz

You may notice that when performing these movements that one side may feel easier on one side than another due to natural asymmetries and muscle imbalances. Also (disclaimer time) if you have limited rotation, be sure to start with low weight or no weight and focus on just doing the motion. Also never force more rotation than you can comfortably do. Starting with heavy loads or more rotation than available right off the bat with underlying dysfunction may exacerbate symptoms, but working through them with the focus on mobility can absolutely serve as a means to correct.

 P.S. If these tips are helpful to you, you might find these tips helpful as well which are based on the same concept of how the SI functions and what causes and fixes this type of back pain. 

Powerlifting Attempt Selection for Not Dummies

I recently coached seventeen lifters, the majority of whom had never competed before, through their first powerlifting meet at the Minnesota State Open. They all did very well, had a great time, no one got hurt, and most importantly to me completed more lifts than the rest of the field. This isn’t because they were necessarily stronger, which in most cases they weren’t, but because they chose their lifting attempts more wisely.

The successful lift rate for my lifters was ~82% versus 75% for the rest of the field.

JVB checks-in on her next attempt with me.TJ Turner

JVB checks-in on her next attempt with me.

Attempt selection is easily one of the biggest factors that will not only determine how well you perform overall in a meet but how much you enjoy the experience. Leaving a meet knowing you could have lifted a little more means you’ll be hungry and excited to do it again. Bombing out or missing a lot of lifts will make you feel like crap and ruin your experience. Missing that first squat opener will set the tone for the day.

Get to know your strength level intimately beforehand, and choose ALL your attempts before the day of the meet. This is critical. Don’t show up to the meet with a bunch of numbers in your head or even just your openers. During the meet decision fatigue will set in and you’ll find it harder to make smart decisions. Choose all your openers, and then “bracket” your choices for 2nd and 3rd based on if the previous lift went better or worse than expected. I cringe every time I see a lifter go up to the scoring table after their attempt and run their fingers up and down the conversion chart trying to decide what to do next.

Never, ever, ever miss your opener.

One of my lifters, Kate Gallagher, designed this super useful PDF template for laying out your lifts. Some of my lifters used a notebook, and some used this worksheet, but every single one of them had their lifts picked out before meet day.

pdf

How Much to Lift

1st Attempt: Your opener should be a weight you can lift 10 times out of 10 with a cold and a headache. In most cases it will be a weight you could do for a triple, and not in a best-case-scenario PR in the gym kind of day. Think of it like your very last warm-up rep under the exact conditions you’ll be competing in when you go for your two attempts that actually count. There is no reason to go for a 1st attempt weight that you would be satisfied with in terms of your total. If you only make your opener and miss your second and third attempt you should go home and think about what you’ve done and not repeat that mistake in the future.

Specific heuristics for each lift:

Squat 1st: This is your very first lift of the day and will set the tone. Consider being cautious and conservative.

Bench 1st: The data shows that the bench press eats lifter’s totals. Many, especially new lifters, make technical mistakes on this attempt. Guys especially who haven’t practiced with a pause tend to exaggerate their strength and are surprised how much harder a bench in competition is.

Deadlift 1st: My recommendation is to open at about 80% of your expected max lift. This leaves more in the tank for this demanding lift at the end of a long day.

Misses here: If you miss your 1st attempt due to a technical failure (a rules violation, not a failure to complete the lift) you should take the same weight again or the smallest possible increase (2.5kg). Missing this lift means your whole plan is out the window. I have seen people who miss and go up to their planned 2nd attempt bomb out of the meet all too often.

2nd Attempt: This is your first money lift and should represent about 90% of your maximum potential for the day. Making this lift but missing your third should still leave you with a solid total, but should NOT be a PR attempt or close to your predicted max. Don’t make this mistake of thinking that this is your first crack at a PR and the 3rd attempt gives you a second shot if you miss. Plan for success, not failure. If you have competed before, this attempt could be your 3rd attempt from the previous meet, depending on your progress.

Misses here: A full miss here puts you in a bad position for the 3rd attempt and will be extremely costly to your total. I’d recommend re-trying the same weight and hoping for the best. A technical failure on a completed lift puts you to a decision. You can go up to your planned 3rd attempt if you feel absolutely confident that you’re going to make it, but in my opinion you haven’t earned the right to go up by making your lift, so I would consider taking the lower end of your planned 3rd attempt.

3rd Attempt: Here is where you maximize the potential you brought on game day. This might be a small personal record, or otherwise 100% to 102.5% of your max. It’s not the “go for broke” attempt or the “pray that the crowd pumps you up and you put 50lbs on your max” attempt. Making this lift is what wins meets and increases totals.

Specific heuristics for each lift:

Squat 3rd: At this point in the meet you do not know what the competition is doing relative to you so it’s most important to execute your plan and make your lift. Get some feedback on how your 2nd lift looked from your coach and watch video to inform your perception. Sometimes a lift that felt slow flew up and it’s important to know when choosing your 3rd attempt. When in doubt go with a smaller jump. A lower white-lights lift adds more to your total than a miss at any weight.

Bench 3rd: By now you may have some idea who you are going heads-up with. If you are closely matched with someone else then it might make sense to be more conservative with this lift to ensure a successful lift. 3rd attempt bench presses tend to fail at an astonishing rate, so whatever you think you can do it’s pretty safe to say it’s probably a little bit less than that. In the meet I analyzed that had a large sample of lifters, 33% of 3rd attempt bench presses were successful. Part of this is technical failure due to rules violations, but part of it is just people grossly overestimating their actual strength. Know that a more conservative lift is more likely to add to your total.

Deadlift 3rd: This is the most strategically significant lift of the entire meet. You should know exactly where other lifters in your class stand and how the attempts will play out in the overall results. “If they make this, I need to make this – if they miss, I only need to make this.” It can be the difference between winning and losing, and due to the high-arousal and low technical skill of the lift it’s possible to pull out something you otherwise wouldn’t be capable of especially if you’re a lifter who excels under pressure. That being said, it’s still important to recognize your limits and execute your plan. If this is your first meet, I’d argue that regardless of the difference between winning or losing you should go with the attempt that you’re 95% sure you can make. However, a more experienced lifter might go with a slightly higher attempt (no more than 5kg) if it means the difference between 1st and second place, or winning and losing.

Final Thoughts

Aside from training properly and consistently to prepare, I don’t think anything has a bigger effect on your meet enjoyment and success than attempt selection. Your goal for every meet should be to go 9 for 9 and consider anything other than that a mistake that you should do everything you can to fix next time.

Don’t forget to have fun.

Physically Cultured Challenge: Gripper for Reps

I posted on my Facebook page earlier in the week about how grippers are quite possibly the best way to improve your grip strength for deadlifting.

Now, when I talk about grippers what comes to mind for many people are those junk grippers you find at Target or generic sporting goods stores. As with most things you buy at big box stores, they are junk. If you want something productive, you have to get a real tool.1.0x0

Torsion spring grippers, like the famous IronMind Captains of Crush series are popular and convenient ways to train the crush grip motion of the hand. They consist of a stiff spring connecting two all-metal handles, usually with significant knurling to keep the handles from slipping.

In barbell lifts the main gripping motion is the crushing action of the fingers, as opposed to any direct involvement of the thumb. If you can’t hold on a the weight, even with a mixed grip, it’s because your fingers aren’t strong enough.

If you want a stronger crush grip, grippers are the ticket. Get a range of grippers from one that you can close easily to one that is more challenging and requires you to start from a parallel set. Learning how to set a gripper is imperative.

Captains_of_Crush

Recently I travelled to Phoenix, Arizona on a skydiving trip and I took the opportunity to grab a lift with my good friend Bret Contreras. After we lifted, I challenged him to an impromptu gripper for reps contest.

Multiple rep training is a great way to build both strength and strength endurance in the hands, which is especially applicable to keeping that hand closed around your favorite barbell. You want a gripper that you can close without too much effort so that you can rep it out. You’re not going to do this with a max effort gripper.

P.S. If you need some hardware to get started, I highly recommend my friend and neighbor Matt Cannon’s online gripper store. To the best of my knowledge there is nowhere else you can get your grippers and get them rated in one fell swoop – something I highly recommend so that you know exactly what you’re working with. I explain this a bit more in the video as well.

Checking The Price Tag

When I was a kid, my parents taught me that if you had to ask the price you couldn’t afford it. Through the years I’ve found this maxim to be overwhelmingly true.

But, sometimes you need to check the price tag because you have to make an informed decision, weighing the need or desire with the realities of your financial situation. 

This week one of my favorite athletes and coaches, Mike Tuchscherer, penned an article for Juggernaut about how he learned the hard way how to back off the throttle.

 Coincidentally almost the same day my wife, Jen Sinkler, wrote an article for her own site about the cost of risky fitness pursuits.

I think you should read both pieces because they’re both important and address slightly different angles, but I want to bring up a few points about Mike’s specifically.

If you don’t know who Mike Tuchscherer is he is one of the strongest powerlifters on the planet and is the founder of Reactive Training Systems, best known for advocating a method of training in which the effort of each set is taken into account to inform the rest of the training. RPE, or Rate of Perceived Exertion, is a protocol to rate each set on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being an all-out effort in which you couldn’t possibly have completed another rep.

There is more to it than that, obviously, but the important thing is that Mike is the creator of and chief advocate of a system that hinges on being acutely aware of how much effort you’re expending on what the cost of it is.

And he missed the warning signs to back off.

Mike certainly has the champion mindset locked down, but he didn’t stop to check the price tag and make sure he wasn’t paying too high of a price.

Part of the problem is a lack of awareness and a mindset of checking in on the cost of things to make sure they aren’t getting out of line. Most people probably need to show up to the gym more often and come up with fewer excuses, but this comes down to honestly assessing yourself and as Mike said, “if it gets to the point that you have to consistently force yourself to train, it’s time for a bit of introspection.”

But the other piece of the puzzle, in my not so humble opinion and now half-decade of experience in using it is not using biofeedback.

Your body can tell you what to do and what not to do – if you just pay attention. <- my free article on how to get started using biofeedback in your training.

And as with most things, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. If you can stop doing things that are likely to hurt you then you can skip recovering from the injury.

Physically Cultured Challenge: Two Hand Pinch

This week’s Physically Cultured Challenge is going to test how strong those opposable thumbs of yours really are.

There are two primary ways to train the strength of the thumb, which is often the limiting factor in overall hand strength.

You can either grip something very wide so that the fingers can’t wrap all the way around it – this is called support grip.

Or, you can train the pinch motion of the hand.

Pinch is when the fingers are extended and pressed flat on the object, and the thumb is used to press the object against the fingers.

One of the simplest ways to train the pinch is to squeeze a pair of plates and hold it for time, which is this week’s challenge.

Pinch is an incredibly important movement for overall strength of the hand, but even more so as a counter-balance or opposition movement to the flexion-of-the-fingers-heavy movements most lifters do a lot of. While it’s tempting to think that extending the fingers against resistance such as rubber bands is the opposition movement to finger flexion, and it may be technically correct from a strictly bio-mechanical perspective, it’s not correct physiologically.

This is something I learned from grip legend Adam T. Glass. Adam has always contended that the flexion-opposition movement of the fingers is not extension against resistance, but resistance IN extension of the fingers, such as in the pinch motion, because this is how the hand actually functions. The analogy he offers is that like an alligator’s jaw, the hand is very weak in creating force opening up but extremely strong in staying closed – even when the fingers are extended. This is the kind of thing you can only understand when you truly understand how the body functions in practice, rather than how a textbook suggests it should.

And the experience of grip athletes and rock climbers for whom band finger-extension work has never worked but pinch training has paid huge dividends confirms this theory.

Enough about that – let’s get to pinching.

See the video for details. If you can’t quite lift two 45 pound plates pinched together feel free to modify as appropriate. One thick rubber bumper plate may be a good option for some people.

I look forward to hearing what you can do!

Get Obsessed With Consistency

“Get obsessed with consistency.” The words hit me like the fastball that got me one of many rounds of stitches, right at the eyebrow.

I was reading a pre-release copy of my friend JC Deen’s Stay Leaner Longer, and while that is a fantastic book that I also think you should check out, that’s not entirely the point of this email.

The quote was from a perhaps well-known in small circles Dubai trained named Amir Siddiqui. Amir is known among other coaches for his irreverent take on training, but also his formidable physique and the results he gets with his fancy-pants Emirati clients.

Amir looks like what Batman would look like if he grew a beard and packed on forty pounds of muscle. This is a guy who walks the walk and doesn’t have to convince you because you can see it.

Amir-Consistency

This quote, this quote about consistency has been ringing in my ears for a couple months now since I read it. The problem, as I see it, is that people get obsessed with goals. Women imagine what it will look and feel like when they lose thirty pounds and they fit into their skinny jeans. Guys think about what they’re going to look like when they hit that 500 pound deadlift. Some literature on goals will even recommend this strategy and really encourage you to visualize down to the last detail what it will be like when you hit that goal.

And then reality sets in and you realize that the goal is months, if not years, away and you wonder if this one workout even really matters. If it makes any difference at all if you just go home and hit the couch tonight. You can always catch up tomorrow.

Except that it does matter, and you can’t catch up. Even if you could, realistically you won’t.

The consistency is what matters. Get obsessed with it. Be more obsessed with making it to your next training session than the end goal you have in mind. Be more obsessed with getting the most out of the training session that you’re in the midst of than how you’re going to feel when you achieve the goal.

When it comes to physical transformation, consistency trumps perfection every single time. In school I learned the hard way what it meant to my overall grade when I got a 0 on an assignment I didn’t do. My grade tanked. Even if I had turned in something half-assed and gotten 50%, I still would have had a better average final grade. At Juggernaut’s Become Unstoppable 3 some folks were talking to Mike Israetel and expressing some awe at just how god damn big he was. He said, “Look guys, there’s no secret. I never miss a training session, and I never miss meals.” I thought back to the previous day when everyone else was sitting around chatting and Mike was lifting. I don’t think he has missed a lift or a protein shake in a decade.

It’s not hopes and dreams that add up to big goals, it’s action.

Physically Cultured Challenge: 500 Push Presses

This challenge, something as close to cardio as I get except for the occasional Lift Weights Faster workout, is one of my favorite feats I’ve ever worked on. It’s deceptively simple which may have you looking at it and thinking “that’s it?” I probably had the same reaction when Adam T. Glass issued the challenge to me because I know it took several months to achieve it.

So, let’s see you give it a shot.

The challenge is 500 16kg (35lbs) push presses in 15 minutes for men, 12kg for women.

I personally prefer a kettlebell for this challenge, but you can do what you feel.

You may switch hands as often as you like, and you can rest or do whatever you want but I assure you there is little time for anything but push pressing.

Biofeedback By Any Other Name Would Be as Awesome

I don’t have a smart and allegorical or snarky and funny introduction for this piece, and I’m certainly not going to win a Pulitzer prize for it, but this topic has come up enough times to address it.

Every so often someone emails me or comments on the blog that I’m using the term “biofeedback” incorrectly. According to their experience, biofeedback is where you use a device (amusingly, some people have also asked how much the device costs to do the kind of training I advocate) that monitors some combination of heart rate, skin conductance, brain waves, or other physiological markers, and then make a continuous effort to manipulate those markers. What I recommend as a biofeedback-testing approach to training doesn’t use any of this hardware.

An example application of the traditional approach is the emwave system and protocol, which involves monitoring heart rate and attempting to bring conscious control over your heart rate to lower it and “smooth” it out or bring it into “coherence,” in their terminology.

I’m not going to discuss the efficacy or specific applications of these forms of biofeedback because it’s not my area of expertise.

Let’s instead unpack my version of the definition and the structure of the underlying approach to understand what it means.

The Wikipedia definition of biofeedback describes it as “is the process of gaining greater awareness of many physiological functions primarily using instruments that provide information on the activity of those same systems, with a goal of being able to manipulate them at will.” So, you’ve got a stimulus and a concomitant response, some way to gain awareness and quantify the response, and an attempt to manipulate it. Visually, it’s like this:

Presentation1

Can we fit biofeedback training (as I use the term) into that model?

Lo and behold, biofeedback training fits perfectly into the existing biofeedback training. You’re using range of motion (ROM) to gain insight into the physiological response to a specific movement and using that information to inform your next decision.

Presentation1

Besides just being a bit blinkered by their previous experience, I think folks who are confused by the use of the term biofeedback are missing an important point.

For example, when biofeedback is used clinically as a stress relief or relaxation technique the explicit goal may be to consciously manipulate and lower the heart rate. But you’re not using biofeedback to the end of lowering heart rate, you’re using it as a proxy to relax or, if you want to get technical (which I don’t), effect a change in the autonomic nervous system to push it more parasympathetic.

Similarly, in biofeedback training the apparent goal is to get a positive change in range of motion, but ultimately that is only a proxy for the broader goal, which is to influence the body in such a way that it exhibits a positive physiological response (as determined by the increase in ROM) that over the long term seems to produce the best training results.

Let me be crystal clear on this point:

Doing things in the short term that result in a positive changes in range of motion seems to translate to positive results in the long term.

Biotrainforcerize™

I don’t doubt that it may be better from a marketing standpoint to have a proprietary term exclusive to me and the ideas and protocol I espouse. Sadly, that would violate the simple and pragmatic approach I prefer to use in general.

So for now I’m going to keep calling it biofeedback.