<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dellanave &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dellanave.com/blog/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dellanave.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:45:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Soft Launch of Fighters.com, Finally</title>
		<link>http://www.dellanave.com/blog/2008/04/02/soft-launch-of-fighterscom-finally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dellanave.com/blog/2008/04/02/soft-launch-of-fighterscom-finally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dellanave.com/blog/2008/04/02/soft-launch-of-fighterscom-finally/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been a long time in coming, but we&#8217;ve finally been able soft-launch Fighters.com. The site is pretty web-1.0 right now and most of the content is site->user, but that will change soon. Check it out, let me know what you think. I know there will be bugs, but if you&#8217;re waiting to find [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been a long time in coming, but we&#8217;ve finally been able soft-launch <a href="http://www.fighters.com/">Fighters.com</a>.  The site is pretty web-1.0 right now and most of the content is site->user, but that will change soon.</p>
<p>Check it out, let me know what you think.  I know there will be bugs, but if you&#8217;re waiting to find the last bug you&#8217;ll never launch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dellanave.com/blog/2008/04/02/soft-launch-of-fighterscom-finally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Paid Links</title>
		<link>http://www.dellanave.com/blog/2007/08/22/on-paid-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dellanave.com/blog/2007/08/22/on-paid-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dellanave.com/blog/2007/08/22/on-paid-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I witnessed a pretty phenomenal panel at SES called &#8220;Are Paid Links Evil?&#8221; With a title like that, you know there is going to be some heat right off the bat. I wasn&#8217;t going to post at all, but I think I&#8217;ll throw my few cents in. First of all everyone on the panel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I witnessed a pretty phenomenal panel at SES called &#8220;Are Paid Links Evil?&#8221;  With a title like that, you know there is going to be some heat right off the bat.  I wasn&#8217;t going to post at all, but I think I&#8217;ll throw my few cents in.  First of all everyone on the panel (except Andy Baio) did a phenomenal job.  <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/">Matt</a> did a great job of toeing the company line, and diverting any questions into the question he wishes the attendee would have asked.  <a href="http://www.wolf-howl.com/">Michael Gray</a> in my opinion did a great job of hitting Matt&#8217;s points out of the park.  Thats not to say that Matt doesn&#8217;t have some legitimate points, but Michael was able to pretty well knock down the ones Matt brought up.  <a href="http://www.stuntdubl.com/">Todd Malicoat</a> reiterated several of Michael&#8217;s points and added a few valid points of his own.  I wouldn&#8217;t say he added anything earth shattering, but to be fair Michael covered almost everything.  <a href="http://www.webguerrilla.com/">Greg</a> and <a href="http://www.oilman.ca/">Todd</a> added the &#8220;Look, we do this&#8221; perspective and I always love hearing Greg talk because he doesn&#8217;t mince words.  This crack team really took a lot of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt">FUD</a>-power out of the search-engine&#8217;s argument.  Andy did a good job of convincing everyone that he wasn&#8217;t qualified to even sit at the same table as Greg, Todd, Michael, and Matt much less speak to the question of legitimacy of paid links.</p>
<p>So a few points:</p>
<p>- Matt argued that people are trying to muddy the water and accusing Google of saying that &#8220;all paid links are bad&#8221;.  Matt drew a distinction between paid links that pass PR and paid links that would be clicked by users.  If anything, I think Matt is muddying the water in this case.  Look we all know what we&#8217;re talking about here, the buying and selling of PR.  To say that some paid links are ok if they don&#8217;t pass PR is creating confusion, not clearing it up.  Lets tackle the actual issue, is it evil to sell PR?</p>
<p>- It is in fact nearly impossible to rank in a competitive space without buying links.  Google created this monster.  You can&#8217;t just put your site out there and &#8220;do good&#8221; and expect to rack up links.  It simply won&#8217;t happen.  Buying some juice is critical.  Unless Google can put a stop to it COMPLETELY, its futile to talk about doing it on any level.</p>
<p>- At the beginning of the session they showed this <a href="http://www.rentvine.com/blog/index.php/i-secretly-shot-this-video-of-ses-san-jose/">amusing video</a>.  As you can see I just linked to the video.  The site is about home rentals.  How is that a relevant link?  How does that improve the user experience?  It doesn&#8217;t.  And yet before getting called out on it, Matt encouraged this type of thing as &#8220;creative&#8221;.  So its ok to make an off-topic link-baiting piece, but buying a link from an on-topic relevant site to connect 2 sites that are in the same space is not ok by G/Y/M?  Thats just ridiculous.</p>
<p>- One more thing I&#8217;m going to add in edit: lets not forget that this buying/selling links hurts Google&#8217;s OWN link-selling business.  Like I said before, we&#8217;re talking about PR-passing links..but the reality is that this DOES affect their own bottom line with AdWords.</p>
<p>I think those are the key things I&#8217;d like to throw into the ring.  Certainly no one &#8220;won&#8221; the argument, although if you were on the fence hopefully it pushed you either way more definitively.  I think Google is going to go on a major PR offensive to spread FUD about buying/selling links.  I do think it&#8217;s good that the search engines aren&#8217;t just getting a pulpit to spread their FUD like I&#8217;ve heard has happened in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dellanave.com/blog/2007/08/22/on-paid-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New and Different SEO/M Content?</title>
		<link>http://www.dellanave.com/blog/2006/02/25/a-new-and-different-seom-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dellanave.com/blog/2006/02/25/a-new-and-different-seom-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 01:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dellanave.com/blog/2006/02/25/a-new-and-different-seom-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shoemoney&#8217;s posted in his blog that he&#8217;s going to be launching a new and different SEO/SEM contest.  I think if anyone can pull this off, its Shoe.  Looking forward to seeing how this pans out&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shoemoney&#8217;s <a href="http://www.shoemoney.com/">posted in his blog</a> that he&#8217;s going to be launching a new and different SEO/SEM contest.  I think if anyone can pull this off, its Shoe.  Looking forward to seeing how this pans out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dellanave.com/blog/2006/02/25/a-new-and-different-seom-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

