Our happy users tend to focus on seeing the faces of the bloggers they read and users with the same interests. That works for a lot of people but not everyone. Hopefully, we’ll find a way to make you happy later.
I see it as somewhat like the 2007 version of a 1994 web counter. It seemed like a good idea at the time. In my estimation, the added value isn’t there. “Seeing” the faces doesn’t do it for me. It doesn’t encourage people to comment or participate, and its yet another confusing and time consuming avenue to find other things to read. Like I implied, maybe I just don’t get it.
In any case, I’m impressed that you’re out there reading and responding to feedback.
The pics of peoples faces don’t really do it for me either, I’m more interested in the names people pick for themselves (i guess how they ‘brand’ themselves).
Watchout David, Scott might ply you with happy pills to make you happy.
Our happy users tend to focus on seeing the faces of the bloggers they read and users with the same interests. That works for a lot of people but not everyone. Hopefully, we’ll find a way to make you happy later.
Scott,
I see it as somewhat like the 2007 version of a 1994 web counter. It seemed like a good idea at the time. In my estimation, the added value isn’t there. “Seeing” the faces doesn’t do it for me. It doesn’t encourage people to comment or participate, and its yet another confusing and time consuming avenue to find other things to read. Like I implied, maybe I just don’t get it.
In any case, I’m impressed that you’re out there reading and responding to feedback.
MBL seems to exist to give Shoemoney traffic.
The pics of peoples faces don’t really do it for me either, I’m more interested in the names people pick for themselves (i guess how they ‘brand’ themselves).
Watchout David, Scott might ply you with happy pills to make you happy.
it just cements my theory that I will never get laid with a fitty by writing badass blog entries